← Return to all blog posts
What Special Education Directors Need to Know About AI in Psychoeducational Evaluations
AI is already reshaping evaluation workflows — Here’s what that means for you and your team
Artificial intelligence (AI) isn’t just hype — it’s already being used in schools to automate time-consuming tasks, surface data trends, and support educators in decision-making. But when it comes to psychoeducational evaluations, it’s understandable that special education leaders may feel cautious.
How can we use AI responsibly — and compliantly — in high-stakes work like assessments?
This post breaks down what you *need* to know: what AI is (and isn’t) doing in the evaluation space, where it adds value, and what to ask when considering AI-enabled tools.
What AI Can (and Can’t) Do in Psychoeducational Evaluations
Let’s be clear up front: AI is not replacing school psychologists. It is not diagnosing students, administering tests, or making eligibility decisions.
What AI can do is:
- Generate narrative drafts based on structured input
- Flag inconsistencies or missing data in reports
- Recommend relevant content aligned to the student’s profile
- Summarize large volumes of data for easier review
Used thoughtfully, these tools can help psychologists spend less time formatting reports and more time interpreting data and planning for student needs.
Why It Matters for Directors of Special Education
For district leaders facing:
- Chronic staffing shortages
- Growing backlogs
- Pressure to stay compliant while supporting staff
AI-enabled tools can be a lever for efficiency and sustainability.By streamlining administrative tasks, AI can help psychologists focus on higher-order work — like collaboration, family communication, and data-driven decisions. It also supports consistency and quality across evaluators, especially in larger or decentralized districts.
The Risks of Moving Too Fast (or Not Fast Enough)
Some leaders worry that introducing AI could lead to compliance issues, loss of quality, or distrust among staff. Others worry that by ignoring AI, they risk falling behind or burning out their teams.
Here’s the reality: AI in education is evolving quickly — and districts that proactively shape how it’s used will be better positioned than those that wait.That means asking the right questions now.
Questions to Ask Before Using AI in Evaluations
- How is the AI being trained? Look for tools trained on education-specific content and guided by experts in school psychology and IDEA compliance.
- What data is being used — and how is it protected? Ensure vendors are FERPA-compliant, transparent about data handling, and do not store personally identifiable student information in open models.
- Is the output editable and reviewable by a licensed evaluator? AI-generated content should always be treated as a starting point, not a finished product.
- Will this actually save my team time — or create new steps? Choose tools that integrate with your existing workflows and reduce double entry.
- How are you supporting staff buy-in? Make space for training, feedback, and iteration. The most successful implementations are collaborative, not top-down.
Responsible AI Use Starts with Strong Leadership
Districts don’t need to be experts in AI to start benefiting from it — but they do need to lead with clarity, caution, and collaboration. When used responsibly, AI can help reduce burnout, increase consistency, and make the evaluation process more efficient for both staff and families.
The future of special education evaluations isn’t about replacing people — it’s about giving them better tools.
Want to see how Marker helps districts cut report-writing time in half while improving quality and consistency? We’d love to show you.
Written by The Marker Learning Team
